BIBO -- M

[lingu]

(08-12-2021 08:56 PM)zhihao Wrote:  I don't know why "756/content" in fastdata has content, but is empty in dir "typical/756". I thought procone2.py would proceed cases based on those in dir "typical", but it is not

Code:

[root@wp289b-1 processed]# cat /thinker/fastdata/bibo/e/res2/16/756/content{"type":"insert","query":"","caseid":"","insert":{"keys":[{"key1":"合同诈骗","key2":"非公经济立案监督","key3":"合同诈骗与民事违约行为的界限","detailid":"0f4ed0c6a33a4d81af8801bbbeb22a75"},{"key1":"合同诈骗","key2":"非公经济立案监督","key3":"挂案","detailid":"8963beff453942cdb9fde0c8fd65cee1"},{"key1":"合同诈骗","key2":"非公经济立案监督","key3":"监督撤销案件","detailid":"dafe5208e40b434d8a0c5a7c9a6f36f4"}],"caseid":"237a820329d84bf8ad5d910ad40d1f52","casetitle":"温某某合同诈骗立案监督案","caserate":"5.0","casetype":"指导性案例","caseaction":"合同诈骗罪","caseyear":"2020","content":"温某某合同诈骗立案监督案\r\n（检例第91号）\r\n【关键词】\r\n合同诈骗  合同欺诈  不应当立案而立案  侦查环节“挂案”  监督撤案\r\n【要旨】\r\n检察机关办理涉企业合同诈骗犯罪案件，应当���格区分合同诈骗与民事违约行为的界限。要注意审查涉案企业在签订、履行合同过程中是否具有非法占有目 的和虚构事实、隐瞒真相的行为，准确认定是否具有诈骗故意。发现公安机关对企业之间的合同纠纷以合同诈骗进行刑事立案的，应当依法监督撤销案件。对于立案后久侦不结的“挂​案”，检察机关应当向公安机关提出纠正意见。\r\n【基本案情】\r\n犯罪嫌疑人温某某，男，1975年10月出生，广西壮族自治区钦州市甲水务有限公司（以下简称甲公司）负责人。\r\n2010年4月至5月间，甲公司分别与乙建设有限公司（以下简称乙公司）、丙建设股份有限公司（以下简称丙公司）签订钦州市钦北区引水供水工程《建设工程施工合​同》。根据合同约定，乙公司和丙公司分别向甲公司支付70万元和110万元的施工合同履约保证金。工程报建....
[root@wp289b-1 processed]# cat /thinker/net/ynet/soft/bibo/procuratorate/cases/typical/756/content
{"type": "","query": "","caseid": "___","insert": {"keys": [], "caseid": "___" }}

Let's make the test case clear. What test did you run to test the delete function?